jen's profile尋找風の終點...PhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help

Blog


    July 21

    Artificial Sweeteners May Wind Up In Your H20

    Diet Water? Artificial Sweeteners May Wind Up In Your H20
    By Emily Main, Rodale.com
    Water treatment plants don't filter chemical sweeteners, a new report finds.

    Chemicals that make our diet soda and foods taste sweeter may be souring the environment. A new study published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology has found that artificial sweeteners aren't being removed during wastewater treatment, and they're showing up in rivers, lakes, and even tap water.

    THE DETAILS: Researchers took water samples from 10 wastewater treatment plants, four rivers, and nine lakes in Switzerland and tested them for the presence of four artificial sweeteners: acesulfame K (sold under the brand name Sunett), sucralose (sold as Splenda), saccharin (used in Sweet'N Low), and cyclamate (which is banned in the U.S. but still used in Europe). Acesulfame K was the most prevalent, cropping up in 65 percent of their water samples, and along with sucralose, it was detected in treated wastewater in concentrations equal to those found in untreated wastewater. The scientists also tested wastewater sludge to see if those same sweeteners degraded after seven hours. They didn't. The researchers also gathered samples of tap water in Zurich, which draws its water from many of the groundwater sources tested, and found acesulfame in the tap water as well.

    WHAT IT MEANS: Whether it's artificial sweeteners or the pharmaceuticals and personal-care product chemicals that have been detected in American waterways, the synthetic substances we use every day don't simply disappear when we chug a diet soda, flush a toilet, or take a shower. And we don't know yet what impact these pseudosugars will have on our waterways, although a prior study on the prevalence of sucralose in rivers and lakes suggests that it could interfere with some organisms' feeding habits. Artificial sweeteners also aren't currently included in tests used by water filter manufacturers, so you may just have to accept that even filtered tap water may start tasting a little sweeter.

    WHAT YOU CAN DO: Use fruits and herbs to sweeten your drinks; tell the EPA you want artificial sweeteners kept out of your water.

    Here are a few ways to cut down on your exposure to chemical sweeteners:

    Go natural. Rather than use artificial sweeteners to cut your calorie intake, use fruits and herbs to make your own "diet soda." Our Nickel Pincher columnist recently offered quite a few recipes for satisfying summer drinks. And make sure what you drink most is water, with brewed teas and low-fat dairy products your second most frequent choice.

    Read labels. Artificial sweeteners are used in everything from drinks to low-calorie bread loaves to toothpastes. Keep an eye out for acesulfame K (also listed as acesulfame potassium), saccharin, and sucralose. Aspartame, another artificial sweetener commonly used in diet sodas, wasn't included in this study because it, previous research has found, biodegrades pretty quickly into the environment.

    Alert the EPA. Send a public comment to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency telling them to research the effects of artificial sweeteners in drinking water.


     Add to Technorati Favorites

    July 17

    His SMILES!

    Created by Jenny Ho

    Forbes World's Most Expensive Cities To Live

    Forbes World's Most Expensive Cities To Live
     
    20. Dubai, UAE
    20. Dubai, UAE
    ©Philip and Karen Smith/Iconica
    March 2008 Ranking: 52

    COL Index March 2008: 89.3
    COL Index March 2009: 90.1
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: 0.8%

    19. Helsinki, Finland

    19. Helsinki, Finland  
    ©iStock

    March 2008 Ranking: 21
    COL Index March 2008: 101.1
    COL Index March 2009: 90.5
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -10.5%

    18. Rome, Italy
    18. Rome, Italy
    ©iStock

    March 2008 Ranking: 16
    COL Index March 2008: 103.9
    COL Index March 2009: 91.2
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -12.2%

     

    17. Tel Aviv, Israel
    17. Tel Aviv, Israel
    ©iStock

    March 2008 Ranking: 14
    COL Index March 2008: 105
    COL Index March 2009: 91.9
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -13.2%

    16. London, U.K.
    16. London, U.K.
    ©iStock

    March 2008 Ranking: 3
    COL Index March 2008: 125
    COL Index March 2009: 92.7
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -25.8%

    15. Caracas, Venezuela
    15. Caracas, Venezuela
    ©Hisham Ibrahim /The Image Bank

    March 2008 Ranking: 89
    COL Index March 2008: 79.3
    COL Index March 2009: 93.3
    OL March 2009 vs. March 2008: 17.7%

    14. Oslo, Norway
    14. Oslo, Norway
    ©Andrea Pistolesi /The Image Bank

    March 2008 Ranking: 4
    COL Index March 2008: 118.3
    COL Index March 2009: 94.2
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -20.4%

    13. Paris, France
    13. Paris, France
    ©iStock

    March 2008 Ranking: 12
    COL Index March 2008: 109.4
    COL Index March 2009: 95.1
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -13.1%

    12. Shanghai, China

    12. Shanghai, China  
    ©iStock

    March 2008 Ranking: 24
    COL Index March 2008: 98.3
    COL Index March 2009: 95.2
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -3.2%

    11. Milan, Italy
    11. Milan, Italy
    ©Vincenzo Lombardo/ Getty Images

    March 2008 Ranking: 10
    COL Index March 2008: 111.3
    COL Index March 2009: 96.9
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -12.9%

    10. Singapore
    10. Singapore, Singapore
    ©Allan Baxter/ Digital Vision

    March 2008 Ranking: 13
    COL Index March 2008: 109.1
    COL Index March 2009: 98.0
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -10.2%

    9. Beijing, China
    9. Beijing, China
    ©iStock

    March 2008 Ranking: 20
    COL Index March 2008: 101.9
    COL Index March 2009: 99.6
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -2.3%

    8. New York City, U.S.
    8. New York City, US
    ©joSon/Stone/Getty Images

    March 2008 Ranking: 22
    COL Index March 2008: 100.0
    COL Index March 2009: 100.0
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: 0%  

    7. Copenhagen, Denmark
    7. Copenhagen, Denmark
    ©iStock

    March 2008 Ranking: 7
    COL Index March 2008: 117.2
    COL Index March 2009: 105.0
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -10.4%

    6. Zurich, Switzerland
    6. Zurich, Switzerland
    ©iStock

    March 2008 Ranking: 9
    COL Index March 2008: 112.7
    COL Index March 2009: 105.2
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -6.7%  

    5. Hong Kong
    5. Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    ©Maremagnum/Photographer's Choice

    March 2008 Ranking: 6
    COL Index March 2008: 117.6
    COL Index March 2009: 108.7
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -7.6%

    4. Geneva, Switzerland
    4. Geneva, Switzerland
    ©iStock 

    March 2008 Ranking: 8
    COL Index March 2008: 115.8
    COL Index March 2009: 109.2
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -5.7%

    3. Moscow, Russia
    3. Moscow, Russia
    ©Elena Solodovnikova/iStock

    March 2008 Ranking: 1
    COL Index March 2008: 142.4
    COL Index March 2009: 115.4
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: -19.0%  

    2. Osaka, Japan
    2. Osaka, Japan
    ©William Banagan/ The Image Bank
    March 2008 Ranking: 11

    COL Index March 2008: 110
    COL Index March 2009: 119.2
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: 8.4%

    1. Tokyo, Japan
    1. Tokyo, Japan
    ©Luciano Lepre/The Image Bank

    March 2008 Ranking: 2
    COL Index March 2008: 127
    COL Index March 2009: 143.7
    COL March 2009 vs. March 2008: 13.1%

    Add to Technorati Favorites